This historic page was the first, in 1999, two years after her death, to place the key pieces in the puzzle of the "accident" of Princess Diana:
It was also the first page to put the piece of her murder together with the refusal of Prince William to be King, immediately after he announced it, October 2001. (1)
In the last years, those who murdered Diana revealed also how they did it. After 10 years, in June 2007, the illuminati media broadcasted for the first time "Diana: The Witnesses In The Tunnel", where the illuminati went as far as telling the public:
- the plan to use the "evil paparazzi" as the perfect scapegoat for the public, in the first days after the murder (2);
- the satanic ritual murder of slightly injured Princess of Wales, AFTER the crash, during the more than one hour she was kept in the ambulance, parked in the street, just meters away from a hospital. (3)
(1) The articles below - "Prince William refuses to be King", "The puzzle of Princess Diana's death", "Princess Diana death vs. John Kennedy Jr. death - the media" - were archived first time 2001 by webarchive.
(2) The french photographers can finally tell what happened in the tunnel, as they were arrested and terrorized, immediately after the crash, as planned by the conspirators. This documentary marks the end of the process where the murders of Diana openly revealed EVERYTHING about how good their plot worked.
(3) To let everyone understand that Diana, on the back right seat, was only slightly injured and that in fact she was murdered AFTER the crash, that TV documentary also includes the testimony of french doctor Frederic Mailliez, who arrived by chance to the scene before the murderers supposed to finish the job. Dr. Mailliez started to treat Diana the best he could. He supplied Princess Diana with oxygen, before the "emergency rescuers" got her in the ambulance. He states that Diana was under shock, but had no visible injuries. (4)
(4) What was the only thing they did not openly show in the documentary, besides the satanic ritual murder in the ambulance? Explained in "The story of the photos of Diana after the crash, from August 1997 to July 2007 ".
(5) Why did the illuminati use the last ten years to gradually reveal the details about how they did it? Explained in "The plot of the assassination of Princess Diana vs. the 9/11 plot ".
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/552187/posts October 19, 2001 (since the murder of Terri Schindler, aka Schiavo, freerepublic.com is reduced to the last bunker of the official supportes of nuclear Hitler).
(1) Still possible to read the Star magazine article as archived, January 2002
(2) May 2007: Illuminati Supreme Court sentences Prince William to death in public - at the White House
(3) July 2007: Illuminati Media - coverage of concert for Princess Diana vs. coverage of Illuminati Icon Paris Hilton
This is how AP reported it, at the end of a August 30 news wire :
Al Fayed, Egyptian-born owner of Harrods department store, put together a video presentation for the press in Washington on Thursday, saying he was "in no doubt that the deaths were a result of murder with racism at the core" and setting out his allegations in more detail.
Much old ground was covered, but he added that Diana's body had been embalmed within hours of her death and that this was to prevent proper forensic tests in Britain.
A French magistrate's investigation blamed the accident on driver Henri Paul, saying he was drunk. Al Fayed has alleged -- and repeated Thursday -- that the driver, who also died, had ties to British intelligence. Former British agent Richard Tomlinson, whose book about the intelligence service was blocked in Britain, supported Al Fayed's allegations in a video presentations. But French investigators long ago concluded that Henri Paul had no ties to British or any other intelligence agency.
After, the mountain of evidence hinting at a murder was either ignored or served as broken pieces. Just enough to terrorize the people posing questions by letting them understand what really happened. In particular her body is embalmed just a few hours after her death, to prevent an autopsy.
Richard Tomlinson was employed by MI6 British (Secret Intelligence Service) in September 1991. In April 1995, he was dismissed without warning, and without reason. He dares to fight the abuses of power and is jailed. Released in 1998, he fled Britain because he realised that MI6 were determined to re-arrest him for any reason they could find. He published the list of 116 British spies. Among them the brother of Diana's self-confessed best friend, the Hon Rosa Monckton.
11 September 1998 - Tomlinson writes a letter to John Wadham, detailing a UK MI6 plan of 1992 that would have used a bright blinding light, inside a tunnel, to cause President Slobodan Milosevic of Serbia to be killed in a car crash : "Fishwick’s third proposal was to kill Milosevic in a staged car crash, possibly during one of his visits to the ICFY (International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia) in Geneva, Switzerland. Fishwick even provided a suggestion about how this could be done, such as by disorientating Milosevic’s chauffeur using a blinding strobe light as the cavalcade passed through one of Geneva’s motorway tunnels."
12 May 1999 - About a sworn and testified statement that Tomlinson made to the enquiry into the deaths of the Princess of Wales, Dodi al Fayed, and Henri Paul to the French Magistrate, he comments : "I firmly believe that MI6 have information in their files that would assist Judge Stephan's enquiry. Why don't they yield up this information ? They should not be entitled to use the Official Secrets Act to protect themselves from investigation into the deaths of three people, particularly in the case of an incident of this magnitude and historical importance." ... "Whatever MI6's role in the events leading to the death of the princess of Wales, ... "
One of the few journalists to try to put some of these threads together was Jane Tawbase, in the Eurobusiness magazine : " The Moncktons are a British "spy" family. Did MI6 ask Rosa Monckton to do the key job, of moving into the Princess's inner circle and becoming her confidante, just as her grand-father had become the confidante of Edward VIII ? ... As for the man who started it all, Richard Tomlinson, is now based in Geneva. Tomlinson is angry about his treatment at he hands of MI6 and is motivated by revenge. But he is a sane, rational man, not the sort to irrationally fabricate a story."
The next line might explain why her article was published : "Interestingly Tomlinson does not believe that MI6 had any hand of part in the princess's death. He says clearly and simply, that a number of MI6 informants were connected with the event because of the surveillance ...". Compare "does not believe" with Tomlison's "whatever role" above.
the BIG LIE technique