Writings of a Finnish Military Expert on 9/11
Evidence of advanced fusion devices at the WTC:
1. Pulverization of 99% of concrete into ultra fine dust as recorded by official studies. Concrete dust was created instantly throughout the towers when the fusion device million degree heat rapidly expanded water vapour 1000-fold in the concrete floors.
2. Superheated steels ablating (vaporizing continuously as they fall) as seen in video clips of the towers collapsing. This requires uniform temperatures roughly twice that of thermite. Conventional demolition or explosive charges (thermate, rdx, hdx etc.) cannot transfer heath so rapidly that the steel goes above it's boiling temperature.
3. 22 ton outer wall steel sections ejected 200 meters into the winter garden. Cutting charges cannot eject heavy steels and throwing charges cannot provide the energy required without heavy, solid surface mounts.
4. 330 ton section of outer wall columns ripping off side of tower. Cutting charges cannot eject heavy steels linked together and throwing charges cannot provide the energy required without very heavy, solid surfaces to mount those charges.
5. Molten ponds of steel at the bottom of elevator shafts (WTC1, WTC2, WTC7). Massive heath loads have been present at the lower parts of these high-rise buildings. As one of the witnesses after seeing the flow of metals declared: "no one will be found alive".
6. The spire behaviour (stands for 20-30 seconds, evaporates and goes down, steel dust remains in the air where the spire was). The spire did not stand because it lost its durability when the joints vaporized.
7. Sharp spikes in seismograph readings (Richter 2.1 and 2.3) occurred at the beginning of collapse for both towers. Short duration and high power indicate an explosive event.
8. A press weighting 50 tons disappeared from a basement floor of Twin Towers and was never recovered from debris. Not possible with collapses or controlled demolitions. The press was vaporized or melted totally.
9. Bone dust cloud around the WTC. This was found not until spring 2006 from the Deutsche Bank building. (In excess of 700 human remains found on the roof and from air vents). See http://www.911citizenswatch.org/print.php?sid=906
10. Fires took 100 days to extinguish despite continuous spraying of water. Thermate would burn out totally and then cool down much faster, just in a few days. This long cooling time means the total heath load being absorbed into the steels of the WTC was massive, far in excess anything found in collapses or typical controlled demolitions.
11. Brown shades of color in the air due nuclear radiation forming NO2, NO3 and nitric acid. TV and documentary footage changed the color balance to blue to disguise this fact indicating complicity in the coverup.
12. Elevated Tritium values measured in the WTC area but not elsewhere in New York. Official studies stated that 8 EXIT signs from two commercial Boeing jets were responsible. The tritium in those EXIT signs is insufficient to explain the measurements (very little tritium is available for measuring after evaporation into air as hydrogen and as tritiated water vapour. This can provide conclusive proof of fusion devices and therefore US/Israeli military involvement.
13. Pyroclastic flow observed in the concrete-based clouds. Only found with volcanic eruptions and nuclear detonations. The explosion squibs cool down just a few milliseconds after the explosion or after having reached some 10 meters in the air. Pyroclastic flow will not mix with other clouds meaning very serious heath in those clouds not possible with the conventional demolition or explosive charges. The pyroclastic clouds were cooling down at the WTC but this process took some 30 seconds. See http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1381525012075538113
14. Huge expanding dust clouds 5 times the volume of the building indicating extreme levels of heat generated far in excess of traditional demolition explosives.
15. Rubble height was some 10% of the original instead of 33% expected in a traditional demolition. Fusion device removal of underground central steel framework allowed upper framework to fall into this empty space and reduce the rubble height.
16. No survivors found, except some firefighters in one corner pocket in the rubble who looked up to see blue sky above them instead of being crushed by collapsing debris. Upward fusion flashlight-like beam of destruction missed this pocket but removed debris above those lucky firemen.
17. 14 rescue dogs and some rescue workers died far too soon afterward to be attributed to asbestos or dust toxins (respiratory problems due to alpha and tritium particles created by fusion are far more toxic)
18. Record concentrations of near-atomic size metal particles found in dust studies due to ablated steel. Only possible with vaporized (boiling) steels.
19. Decontamination procedure used at Ground Zero (hi-pressure water spraying) for all steel removed from site. Water spraying contains fusion radioactivity.
20. No bodies, furniture or computers found in the rubble, but intact sheets of paper covered the streets with fine dust. Items with significant mass absorbed fusion energy (neutrons, x-rays) and were vaporized while paper did not. Paper and powder theory.
21. 200 000 gallon sprinkler water tanks on the roofs of WTC1 and WTC2, but no water in the ruins. Heat of fusion devices vaporized large reservoirs of water.
22. Reports of cars exploding around the WTC and many burned out wrecks could be seen that had not been hit by debris. Fusion energy (heath radiation and the neutrons) caused cars to ignite and burn far from WTC site.
23. Wide area electrical outage, repairs took over 3 months. Fusion devices cause EM pulse with Compton scattering. See German engineers help the USA plate 5. http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas.bunkahle/defaulte.htm
24. EM pulse was recorded by broadcast cameras with high quality electronic circuitry. This occurred at the same time as the seismic peaks recorded by Lamont Doherty during the beginning of the collapse. This is due to the Compton Effect and resulted in a large area power outage at the WTC.
Source: http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/evidence.htm
Source of following article : http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/H-device.htm
Notes about the source:
For readers I would suggest first to examine the unusual features of the collapses of the Twin Towers and also the issue of Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons.
The theory of military expert is controversial. Some find it as a plausible explanation while some obviously not.
A reply from military expert to criticism of Mr. Partanen
WTC hydrogen bomb theory refuted
All the commentary of the Finnish military expert is here with yellow background. I have marked bad mistakes, like swapping Hydrogen bombs with Atomic bombs, red-on-gray.
The most disquieting thought to emerge from 9/11 truthseeking is that the succession of events that attained its highest point thus far on September 11 may yet lead to the use of an atomic bomb. If Iran is to be attacked, low-yield atomic weapons may be needed to accomplish the task. They will not be used unless terrorists commit an atomic explosion on Western soil.
Meanwhile, however, it it has been proposed that k+1 nuclear bombs were detonated on 9/11 in the World Trade Center towers.
But this is not my theory and mentioning it here only blurs the matters.
This claim is preposterous for at least the following reasons:
1) Duration of explosion. At what point in time would these bombs have been set off? After all, each tower was destroyed remarkably evenly over a time span of over 10 seconds. Did the bomb radiate its destructive force all that time? Or were there ten bombs per tower (and maybe a couple in Building 7, too)?
Set off seconds before the "collapse" commenced (how surprising, first comes the cause, then comes the effect). The bomb had initial effects, main blast, and after effects all within about 4 seconds. The heath dissipates with no well-defined time frame (gradually).
2) Ability to direct the explosion. Or could the force of the explosion perhaps have been directed to focus to a distance of hundred of meters? This has also been suggested, in this case there would be only one bomb, in the basement.
Correct. One H-bomb, in focus to a distance of several hundred meters upwards.
3) Radio activation. These atomic bombs didn't seem to create much of a fallout...
Mini-hydrogen bombs. Any idea what is the difference of tritium and plutonium?
They create radiation, but far less (1/100) than plutonium bombs. And of different
type. The problem is, you cannot measure it without very expensive instruments.
In the first minutes at ground zero, there are hundreds of different short-lived
radioactive particles. Take a deep breath and you will propably die. Neutrons
did their damage, but they are not showing any longer. Later on, alpha and tritium
particles exist, but they are not easy to reveal. Again, some sniffing like the dogs did
and many will get internal lung damage (not always fatal, but damage anyway). Water
spraying is a good way to speed up the evaporation of these light, radioactive
elements. And that's what they used. Elevated tritium values were found in three
places at the WTC area. Five days later. Some unexpected Beta readings also have
been measured. Guess why they are not telling, what was found earlier, say 9/13?
4) Electromagnetic pulse. The EMP would have been a lot stronger than just having an unknown number of cell phones go (temporarily?) dead - which in any case may have occurred during the destruction of the North Tower. You know, the tower on top of which there was a... telecomm mast.
False. Many types of devices went dead at the moment the first tower "collapsed".
You cannot expect better info than what the German engineers already published.
<http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas.bunkahle/plate5.htm>
Locating the mini-hydrogen bomb underground and directing it upwards both will
reduce the EMP pulse effects outside the target building.
5) Seismic shock. Seismic data directly contradicts claims of a massive explosion at the start of the destruction sequence: the shockwaves rise in amplitude and reach their maximum when the rubble hits the ground.
A bomb described above (points 3 and 4) does, in fact, not belong to the class "thought experiment"
but rather to the class "theoretical device". Hydrogen bombs do, however, remain an extremely remote possibility.
Babbling. Pure mini-hydrogen bomb just happens to fit best into the evidence. Whatever you call it. Seismic shock was reduced, because the H-bomb was not directly coupled with the bedrock. You
are free to accept the official explanations, but for me it was a sharp pulse (and the seismic timescale
is propably falsified).
6) Availability. Where, exactly, would these pure H-bombs have been acquired? How many people would it introduce to the conspiracy? Is it reasonable to think that beyond-cutting-edge technology would be field tested for the first time in an operation this important, especially when there are easier options?
They were cutting edge around 1990, not 2001. Surely they have been tested.
A friendly branch of the cabal has propably been allowed to steal some from US storages. This part
of the conspiracy needs propably four people. The same cabal using these mininukes seems to have influence into what types of nuclear bombs are being monitored, and currently the emphasis is on
atomic type devices. The UN near the WTC failed to register these explosions around their corner,
and yet they are supposed to monitor the whole globe effectively. See discussion of modern H-bombs (directed, pure etc.) http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0510/0510071.pdf
7) Need. If plastic explosives, thermite and maybe thermobarics get the job done, why mess around with the nuclear stuff? (Many do not even consider the claim that potential energy alone could explain the observed destruction to be surprising enough to protest it, so how likely is it that there were devices of even greater destructive power in the towers?)
A single non-radioactive smaller-than-pineapple device reduces the need of explosives by more than
a quarter (I'm talking thousands of charges being saved). It helps to solve the problem of very strong
core columns near the bedrock and the need to use very heavy charges. It also creates a deep
mystery –the crime scene is more difficult to analyse.
From economic point of view the NYC would have spent soon 2 billion dollars to dismantle the
WTC containing asbestos, and it would have caused some years of traffic jams. The new buildings
would have cost some 10 billion dollars and again have caused more traffic problems. Controlled demolition well done and combined with an insurance fraud saved some 2+7 billion dollars and
two years of traffic jams to the NYC. After 9/11 the insurance companies all raised the insurances
of any high rise buildings and actually got more wealthy. The true losers are we the People.
8) Risk. If the bomb emitted any radiation at all, it might have been detected. Unless the conspirators succeeded in manning these security positions as well, I suppose.
These bombs have so far never been analysed correctly. Using them in the US was practically riskless because the cabal controls the key institutions and is able to cause what looks like "stand down order"
in the air defence, for an example. Or to cover up the shooting of the congressman Ryan and the mass murderof some 700 americans at Jonestown, Guayana (as declared by the local coroner
Leslie Mootoo).
9) Other observations. An atomic bomb is not required to explain the fact that pieces of the
towers were thrown into the walls of nearby buildings: Most of the pieces claimed to be heavy steel
are in fact aluminium cladding, and during the destruction sequences tensions in the structures of the
towers were surely high enough to propel a small number of wall elements all the way to eg. WFC3.
I see nothing strange about the alleged brown hue of the dust clouds, and the "afterglow" that is occasionally mentioned (a flare effect?) can be seen only on one or two videos. Persistent heat
in the rubble can be explained with the continuing chemical reaction of excess thermite.
To start with misleading elements here: mini-hydrogen bombs, not atomic bombs. The wall elements weight 22 tons each and in upper parts of the towers they are 4 floors high. They were bolted and welded into other exterior wall elements and into the floors. Exactly such elements are visible in the walls
of neighbouring buildings (like in the AMEX building 175 meters away). They were both ripped off and thrown upwards at almost the optimal 45 degree angle. The aluminium cladding needs not to be talked, those steel elements were clearly recognized. In controlled demolitions the elements are usually thrown away horizontally. In this case there was no good locations to place such charges (they usually need
cutter charges to cut elements off and springer charges combined to throw them away). From these
towers it was difficult to get the outer wall elements flying. If the springer charge is a powerful
explosive –like C-4 the steel element will be smashed into fragments and it will not fly at all. Any
need to throw these elements is missing, and while one could claim some just flew accidentally
this is not explaining why those elements were thrown upwards into a long-flying trajectory.
So what really happened was not a controlled demolition using military explosives only. What was observed was some unavoidable side effects of a thermonuclear detonation. The first outer
wall elements started to fly upwards, because the H-bomb was in the basement and it was directed upwards. The heath from this thermonuclear device also explains many other observations like:
The surface of the steel elements begun to boil and evaporated as a gray vapor
There was record quantities of near-molecular metallic dust in the WTC area
The people, the furniture and the computers in towers vapourized, disappearing
Practically all the concrete in towers disintegrated into very fine dust
There was pyroclastic flow observed in the rapidly expanding clouds at the WTC
The explosion clouds expanded rapidly into 5-fold volume (in controlled demos
they should only move off a few meters and then cool down, not moving any more)
The steels were superhot a long time, because some of their interiors were heated
up into something like 7000 degrees C. First such a steel evaporates, the outer-
most layers vapourize and the rest cools off very little. Later the temperature goes
belowe the boiling point around 3000 degrees C. Now the steel becomes white hot
and starts melting, cooling off a little. Later the temperature goes belowe the melting
point around 1550 degrees C and the steel cools off more, becoming yellow hot, red
hot and so on in the process.
The spire behauviour –some coupled core steel columns remained standing about
25 seconds, ablating, and after having vapourized enough the joints broke down
and the steel columns disappeared quickly downwards, but the steel vapour
remained in the air, slowly disappearing into wind.
There was ponds of molten steel in the elevator shafts of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7.
They were difficult to cool down, because other steels above them first vapourized
all the water being sprayed. So the hottest steels did not meet the water at all.
There was paper trash on the streets, because some stacks of paper avoided the
cone of destruction of the directed mini-thermonuclear bomb. So the blast wave
bypassed some paper stacks and the following turbulence threw papers out of the
windows. The paper is too soft a target for high energy neutrons, so the papers
did not heath up and disintegrate like the heavier elements.
The basic thermite cannot explain the heath for more than a few days. But there is
no point of using that, either. If attached to core columns, thermite charges will melt
their binders much before they are able to melt those vertical columns. What was
propably used was army-type demolition charges. They have thermite mixed with
sulfur and nanoaluminium, possibly with other chemicals too. They build a very hot
cutting spray which is capable of cutting through steel beams quickly, 10...100 times
faster than the basic thermite (and this mix is often called thermate). And the basic
thermite only melts, it has no cutting effect (so it would be better suited for horizontal
beams). But both thermite and thermate will burn continuously, they already have all
the oxygen they need. The reason those underground steels were hot for 100 days
is in the massive heath load caused by the thermonuclear directed energy device, not
some isolated packages of thermite or thermate.
Though it's not impossible than an atomic device was in each tower, I consider this
to be the third most implausible theory of the relatively well-known ones: only
bluescreens and holograms go beyond it. (If you don't know what 'bluescreens'
and 'holograms' refer to, well, good.)
Obviously you are overestimating your knowledge in many other areas of expertise
besides military explosives and nuclear explosives. I know better than start talking
on 33 year old inventions I'm not an expert. But I can assure you don't know the
state-of-the-art military technology in this field, either.
One more point against the claim of a nuclear bomb needs to mentioned:
Truth strategy
Since the harm done by the "WTC H-bomb" theory has, in contrast to the widespread unfortunate
effects of many other bogus theories, been minimal up to now, it would be easy to just ignore it.
It may not, however, remain that obscure for much longer: Rick Siegel, who in his sincere video
9/11 Eyewitness in passing mentioned that he thought a nuclear bomb had been set off at the WTC,
has included the nuclear bomb theory in Eyewitness Hoboken, the next version of his video.
With this in mind, it may be necessary to examine how the theory has been advanced:
1) An anonymous Finnish "military expert" proposes it.
2) Hannu Yli-Karjanmaa accepts the theory to be posted on the website he maintains, 11syyskuu.org.
Mr. Yli-Karjanmaa is one of the leading 9/11 activists in Finland, and also a supporter of
maintaining neutrality towards every theory, just in case there is some truth to them.
3) According to a message on a Finnish 9/11 email list (maintained by 11syyskuu.org), the
anonymous original theorist agitates Mr. Siegel on the subject.
And so the extreme theory has gone from a dubious source via a Big Tent advocate to, possibly,
wide promotion. Surely, an unfortunate example of the ease at which bogus theories propagate.
I have recently engaged in an email discussion on the issue with the alleged expert, with Hannu
Yli-Karjanmaa acting as an intermediary:
Decide for yourself, but I think that the "expert" displays an astoundingly poor command of facts (conventional, nuclear and WTC-related), and was unable to produce a coherent explanation
that would require an atomic device. For example, he claims that severing each core pillar would
require C4 charges a foot thick and yet a hydrogen bomb alone would not be sufficient.
If one H-bomb per tower was an elegant solution for the collapses that cleanly explained
all the observed phenonema, one might be inclined to entertain it. But it is not.
This is misleading. I said the core is in the shape of fairly long rectangle, and the stealth mini
H-bomb needs to be set so the total-destruction fireball remains within that core rectangle.
Thus at the edge of the core area there will be columns too far to be destroyed with the
mini H-bomb. This is why the hydrogen bomb needs to be augmented with cutter charges
placed on the outermost pillars and the upper floors of the core.Not all, just the outermost ones.
These columns also would be cut into suitable truckloads. The directed H-device and the
cutting charges will quarantee there will be an abyss of at least 20 meters under the central core.
The next cutting plane can be set 40 meters above the bedrock so the tower will still collapse
belowe the groud level. The rest of the cutting charges will be set 20 meters above the previous
cutting plane up to the 90th floor or so. The superthermate cutting charges will cut those core
columns full or almost full cut, after which the mini H-device will shake the columns totally cut.
As the abyss (20 meters) opens in the bottom of the central core, above it there will be fairly heavy
part of the building drawing towards the center and downwards. There will be strong sprays of steel
sparkles in the central core area, and lots of smoke, but no additional oxygen is needed and the
smoke will not be visible before the wall of the core or the top of the tower will break. As a finishing
touch the fire alarm system no doubt was set to malfunction at this time. The cutting charges within the
core need to be triggered first, several minutes before the thermonuclear device in the elevator shaft
at cellar area.
Of course, the mini H-device is not mandatory. The Twin Towers can be demolished using standard
military explosives. If the charges need to be set fairly quickly, some 6 500 charges would be needed
for each tower. And if this could be prepared like a controlled demolition, taking its time (remember
many floors were vacated, no tenants there -the towers already were old and less attractive). If some
of the charges can be sunk within the steels, something in the order of 10 tons of explosives with
plenty of time would suffice. But this is not the point. There is strong evidence, that the attackers
actually used a mini H-device.
For the first, there are hundreds of pictures and videos showing the huge explosion like this one:
This Picture is for education and discussion Only. Not for commercial use.
This is an absolute certain explosion, not any type of collapse or clean,
controlled demolition. And the device in use here is an upwards directed
mini H-bomb. Even in this picture, there are 10+ superheated outer wall elements
spitting a steel-vapour trail behind them. Additionally, plenty of pulverized concrete
is visible! And it comes from the floor plates. In the outer walls of the building there
was steels, glass and some heath insulation only.
It is not possible to set conventional military explosives in a way to achieve this
result shown in the picture. So much and so heavy stuff flying at once simply is not
possible, if the building still was in office use as we know it was. This picture is
stranger than you may believe. The diameter of the mushroom cloud above the
building is in the order of 200 meters. At the edges of this mushroom cloud there
are steels weighting tons and outer wall elements weighting 22 tons each. But also
enormous amouths of pulverized concrete. And more of it climbing vertically upwards
at the top of the tower.
Ejecting those heavy steels, especially those 22-ton outer wall steel elemenments
with onventional military explosives is very difficult because there are very little
strong points behind the outer walls to place springer charges. No one will ever
plan a controlled demolition, where 22-ton steel elements are thrown upwards in
some 60-degree angle. If something needs to be moved to smoothen the explosive
chain it will be moved horizontally. But there is no need for such ejecta, either.
It is commonly believed you could simulate a thermonuclear detonation (or actually
frame it) using huge stocks of conventional military explosives. In this case, where
they actually detonated a 1-kiloton H-device, it should be possible to frame it
setting a thousand tons of tnt within this tower. This means you order 60 truckloads
of tnt (17 tons each) and a huge number of fuzes and explosive cord to wire them.
But remember, we saw some single cutting charges firing 10 to 20 stores belowe the
"collapse", but never more than one at a time. In my opininion, those detonations were
skilfully timed to separate them both in time and in space. Lets see what happens, if
we try to repeat what is shown in the picture using conventional explosives of various
types only.
Suppose we set 200 tons of tnt onto those two floors exploding in the picture. Then
we set it all to be exploded within a few milliseconds. What would happen? The tower
would explode, yes. Those smaller outer wall steels smashed (weighting a few tons)
would fly away just like they do in yhe picture. But those 22-ton wall elements would
not start to fly into a neat ballistic curve first going steep upwards and later downwards.
And the thick steel vapour trail following each one would surely be missing. There would
not be heavy clouds of concrete, there would be thinner dust only. The noise of the
explosion would be much louder. Something like a fireball would form up there (and not
be hidden in the basement out of sight what really happened). A flame would strike out
next to every window not unlike a 2-deck frigate from 18th century firing a full broadside
salvo.
The mechanismus behind the picture above was quite different. The fireball of the H-device
formed out of sight around 3rd cellar floor of the central core. The bomb was directed
upwards so some 95% ot the energy went that way into the cone of destruction. Some
additional holes were propably blown minutes before triggering the H-device in order to
facilitate the explosion. Without it the H-bomb would hit with full force the roof of the
elevator shaft (and the roof of the tower) but this is too narrow and not what was
observed. A terribly strong, invisible blast of neutrons went up in the cone of destruction,
converting steels superhot and exploding lesser objects instantenously. The concrete
floors were penetrated easily and all the concrete exploded as any water within it
vapourized into 1000-fold volume (and not 24-fold, as I said earlier 15 months ago).
Quickly behind the neutron volley arrived the heath wave and the blast wave caused
by the fireball effect. All material within the cone of destruction totally disintegrated
(exect some of the heaviest steel beams and columns). Some materials outside the
cone was also destroyed, because various objects within the cone caused reflections.
The picture shows the situation some six seconds after the neutron volley and four+
seconds after the full pressure wave has hit the outer walls of the tower and broke
through it.
You simply cannot frame a thernonuclear explosion like this and claim that perhaps it
was just a huge explosion using conventional explosives (like super-rdx and super-
thermate in this case). The conventional explosives will produce very much mechanical
energy (blast pressure wave), a little thermal effects and no radioactive radiation of residues.
I suppose that part of the readers who already have some clue will find out roughly
what took place. If you don't know the explosives can be directed, start reading about
the hollow (shaped) charge. Then find out what a claymore mine is, and proceed to some
advanced weapon which affects the target by exploding far away (in Finland we have
what is called "light antitank flanking mine"; in the US there are cluster antitank bombs
with the bomblets hovering and exploding above the tanks with approximately the same
effects). If you don't know the same is possible with a pure hydrogen 4th generation
nuclear bomb, please see the link (Gspooner) referred at the end of reason 6 ) in the
beginning of this document. As I first published this theory the reference was not available
-you know the real experts from their ability to estimate what will be coming next in their
field of profession.
One more step ahead. Why no one has told these things in the magazines, newspapers,
in TV or in the radio? And could there be people so evil they kill thousends of their
countrymen without heasitation? The media is very concentrated and our real rulers are
a small group of ultra wealthy people controlling the media as well as the central banks.
The situation was the same already at the end of 19th century, for more than one hundred
years ago. And regarding the evil those religious people having faith will catch this one
quicker. But the US had it's last true war 1812 (the second war against the British) and
all the wars after that have been based on frameups, false-flag operations and other
state terrorism (including the original Pearl Harbour, which was preceeded by eight
insults against the Japan). In the real life the rulers of smaller countries are not madmen,
and they do not challenge contemporary superpowers, or even states with an equal
strength (what ever the media is saying).
So I hope I have been able to clarify what problems are to be expected when the current
favourite theory in the 9/11 truth movement (MIH with conventional explosives) is being
compared with this mini H-device theory. There are more than 20 weird observations
pointing to my theory. Please try to spread the word.
Thus we conclude the WTC hydrogen bomb, the most significant 9/11 theory of Finnish
origin, to be hopefully dead. Curtain down.
Oh, you still hate to let the readers to decide? In the civilized circles there is such a principle,
that one's own judgements could be subjective, and not very neutral. This is why third persons
are usually called up to estimate the evidence and to give an objective judgement. So I lay
this case to rest and I'm sure some neutral people will comment on this some day.
I suggest the reader starts looking those atomic bomb mistakes or misleads. This young man
tries to refute a specific theory regarding very modern mini-hydrogen devices, but most
of the time what he mentions are atomic bombs.
An atomic bomb is built based on very heavy elements, plutonium or uranium.
An atomic bomb also is very polluting, and it has a critical mass type explosion mechanism
which does not allow very small bombs or also necessary directed energy effects. The
energy distribution of an atomic bomb is also less suitable for the purposes used in the WTC.
An atomic bomb emits 50% of it's energy in blast force, 35% in thermal radiation and the
remaining 15% in various radioactive forms (initial radiation 5%, residual radiation 10%).
The use of covert atomic bombs in the WTC towers is an utterly hopeless idea, which is
why this evil young man misrepresents my theory so eagerly offering those A-bombs.
The hydrogen bomb is very different. It uses the lightest of the elements, like various
forms of hydrogen and lithium. It has very small minimum size, the cherry-size pellets
are typical in fusion energy designs. It can be made into directed-energy device much
like conventional military explosives. And the energy distribution is more useful, some
80% is in neutron and thermal radiation (and in this case, neutrons also use most of their
energy in warming steels and other hard targets). Some 15% goes to blast effects and
the remaining 5% into various radiations. In covert operations like the WTC the residual
effects of the hydrogen bomb are neatly disappearing into the winds and this process
can be speeded up with continuous spraying of water (which also is what happened).
Some of the tritium binds with oxygen forming tritiated water (which is less harmful than
the free tritium remains) and spraying will also get these lighter-than-air molecules moving,
out into the skies.
What will be difficult to cover up are random radioactive changes caused by the energetic
neutrons. This is why those steels were scuttled and exported from the country as quickly
as possible. There will be some hot spots, and melting those steels and re-using them will
not get the radioactivity to disappear. So such a contaminated steel cannot be used freely,
for an example to build furniture, ships, cars or personal armour. Building bridges and oil
tanks with it will be less a health problem. Note: most of the steel will not contaminate
easily. The Fe56 atom absorbs a neutron and becomes a stable Fe57 atom. The Fe57
atom absorbs a neutron and it becomes a stable Fe58 atom. If the Fe58 atom once again
absorbs a neutron, then there will be radioactive Fe59 isotope (Beta minus decay, Gamma
radiation too). But there are small amouths of other elements like Chromium, Nickel and
Vanadium present in the steels, too. Unusual concentrations of Fe57 and Fe58 could tell
the recycled WTC steel has been close to the thermonuclear explosion. And these changes
are permanent, this is proovable 100 years from now if necessary.
No one with any insight into various nuclear weapons will blur these two, atomic bombs
and thermonuclear bombs. And all the observations I mentioned in 3, 4 and 9 need to be
explained somehow. If this mini-hydrogen bomb is not a good explanation, feel free to offer
something better instead. But before something in the lines "asthmathic person with a
breaking oxygen bottle" are being invented to explain each item, I would like to point out,
that if we are searching the truth there is a principle called Occam's razor. Some 20-plus
odd observations can all be explained in elegant way with just a single mini-hydrogen device
with a basement placement. In the end analysis the simplest explanation will prevail.
The Bombs in the WTC
Note: This drawing is schematic only. The actual towers were much taller and the observed arch of destruction of the energy-directed thermonuclear device was correspondingly more narrow.
9/11 - two minutes for the core lie and five minutes for the complete story, the five basic facts, by Matt Marriott