It couldn't have been a 4000 pound ANFO bomb placed in a Ryder truck parked OUTSIDE ( Conclusion #1 )

ANYONE, with a clue about explosives knows that the damage was not done by a truck filled with fertilizer bomb !

Proof # 1 - Photographic evidence

Compare the Khobar Towers terrorist bombing ...

Background:
The Khobar Towers terrorist bombing on 25 June 1996, a cold-blooded act of murder, was a tragic and costly event of unprecedented magnitude, involving a high degree of sophistication. It was an act of war where terrorists detonated a bomb with an estimated likely yield of more than 20,000 pounds of TNT-equivalent explosivesoutside the fence of the American occupied sector of Khobar Towers. The explosion killed 19 service members and injured hundreds more. It also injured many Saudi Arabian citizens and third country nationals (TCNs) and severely damaged or destroyed a significant amount of property. This was the second bombing in Saudi Arabia in less than a year, a country where tens of thousands of Americans had lived safely for decades prior to these attacks.

.... With the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City, 1995 ----- 4000 pound ANFO bomb ----


A building that size must pass many really extensive inspections. Next time you go into a big building parking garage look around.
 Those concrete poles, the concrete ceiling the concrete walls and foundation structure all steel reinforced and computer designed...all huge.  Think of the size and weight that the building puts on the supports, now think about earthquakes, tornado's and such.  The extra level of strength built in is unbelievable. Concrete is gaged by the ability of its structural strength, a simple core sample would reveal any weakness.

Proof # 2 - Laws of physics

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that the force exerted by an unshaped charge is inversely proportional to the SQUARE of the distance, and therefore it is simply impossible for a fertilizer bomb outside the building to have severed three or four columns. That's why there must have been another three or four bombs, presumably strapped to the support columns in the basement. Nothing else could have severed the rebar and pulverized the concrete, which is what brought the building down.
An interesting parallel with the JFK story : in both cases the government/media cover story requires the public to ignore their fundamental understanding of physics  : 1963 we were asked to believe if a man is shot in the back of the head, his head moves backwards and the public bought it.
For a serious study check General Partin report.

There were bombs inside the building  ( Conclusion #2 )

"A classified report prepared by two independent Pentagon experts has concluded that the destruction of the federal building in Oklahoma City last April was caused by five separate bombs. The two experts reached the same conclusion for the same technical reasons." - The quote is from an article in the 3-20-1996 Strategic Investment Newsletter. At the time, William Colby, former CIA Director, was an editor for the publication. Colby died 4-27-1996 in a canoe accident.

An expert on munitions came out after the bombing. His analysis of the damage indicated the same results as this. Additionally, he did a drawing showing WHERE each was placed. He said the entire building didn't come down because of a bad connection, and 2 of the bombs didn't detonate. Those were the ones the "bomb squad" that many of us saw arrive on CNN removed.

 There were exercises conducted the week BEFORE the bombing of a terrorist attack almost exactly the same as the Murrah Building Bombing. AND it is fairly common knowledge in OK City that the Feds did not come in to their offices that day.

One other question, the person who called 911 or who called the bomb squad was a specialist in bomb detonations, and defusing of this particular type and was only a block away.

Coincidence? No more likely than getting 5 in a row straight royal flushes in Vegas.

Pretending there were no bombs inside

Pretending McVeigh did it

McVeigh
Timothy McVeigh
 

So who placed the bombs inside ? ( Conclusion #3 )

The most convincing evidence is the length to which the government has gone to cover-up the fact there were multiple bombs in the building. What do they gain by covering up that ?
Also  revealing : presenting  McVeigh as guilty; attempting to lay a false trail to a foreign party. For the people that started suspecting : creating John Does, as if the cover-up was about who helped McVeigh.

The new justice and the Oklahoma City Bombing - May 2001

Time to set the pieces of the puzzle together

  1. Mass Media implants in the minds of people that McVeigh confessed. The main messenger used is McVeigh's former defense lawyer, Stephen Jones.The fact is that there aren't any video tapes of McVeigh confessing.
  2. All serious studies available prove that McVeigh could not have done it. They were all ignored in the process.
  3. The Department of Justice informs that the FBI accidentally withheld thousands of documents from McVeigh's defense team - one week before McVeigh's execution.
  4. McVeigh's execution is delayed one month, but the Department of Justice immediately states that "now there will be no more delays".
  5. Three days later - May 15 -, the  Department of Justice announces that FBI field offices were told in December that some Oklahoma City bombing records could be discarded, but those instructions were retracted a month later after archivists discovered that some offices had failed to turn over all their evidence to lawyers for Timothy McVeigh. A few hours later it announces that some of the missing documents may have been shredded.
  6. June 4,  the Justice Department
    1. - argued that McVeigh could not prove that newly discovered FBI documents turned over to his attorneys last month showed "actual innocence," as required under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.
    2. - said McVeigh's legal team had identified  only nine new documents "totaling  little more than 20 pages that he claims would have helped the defense." From a total of 4400 pages they had been looking at for the past ten days.

The missing piece - WHY ? ( Conclusion #4 )

The image of the puzzle clearly shows the redefintion of justice the other way round (anti-justice). It shows the precedents set by the most important FBI case in the US history : The missing piece is : why was #3 leaked now, leading to the subsequent pieces, which merely state again #1 and #2 in bold.
The answer is the same as for the question why was this photo staged . To bring the message of terror to everyone. Also to the ones that lost long ago the capacity of posing questions.
June 4, 2001 

The message of the antichrist and the "last words" of Timothy McVeigh

McVeigh ALWAYS believed in God, as he was able to state in the few sentences available in the media, ever since he was arrested, in an interview with TIME magazine (including audio).
One day before being murdered, McVeigh was being portrayed as an agnostic, by the Buffalo News - the newspaper in charge of propagating the "interviews" with McVeigh. Of course McVeigh couldn't speak the final words. The usage of "handwritten" letters was pushed to the utter limits : a note was made public pretending that his final words were "I'm the captain of my soul ...". With this the antichrist is telling people : "We are the captains of your souls".
One thing was not denied to McVeigh : the last sacrament, which includes confession and an absolution of sins, by a catholic priest. The reason was that it gave the opportunity to propagate again the message that McVeigh confessed. The agents used were again the defense lawyers. Here also, cynism was pushed to the utter limits. Asked by media if McVeigh confessed to the priest, attorney Robert Nigh answered : "I think it speaks for itself".
June 11, 2001 
  • Signs of God, May 2001 - McVeigh, Pearl Harbor and the war in the Balkans
  • staging cases to destroy the fundamental values of the natural society (case of FBI agent Hanssen, added July 2001)