It couldn't have been a 4000 pound ANFO bomb placed in a Ryder truck parked
OUTSIDE ( Conclusion #1 )
ANYONE, with a clue about explosives knows that the damage was not done
by a truck filled with fertilizer bomb !
Proof # 1 - Photographic evidence
Compare the Khobar Towers terrorist bombing ...
Background:
The Khobar Towers terrorist bombing on 25 June
1996, a cold-blooded act of murder, was a tragic and costly event of unprecedented
magnitude, involving a high degree of sophistication. It was an act of
war where terrorists detonated a bomb with an estimated likely yield of
more than 20,000 pounds of TNT-equivalent explosivesoutside
the fence of the American occupied sector of Khobar Towers. The explosion
killed 19 service members and injured hundreds more. It also injured many
Saudi Arabian citizens and third country nationals (TCNs) and severely
damaged or destroyed a significant amount of property. This was the second
bombing in Saudi Arabia in less than a year, a country where tens of thousands
of Americans had lived safely for decades prior to these attacks.
.... With the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City, 1995 ----- 4000 pound ANFO
bomb ----
A building that size must pass many really extensive inspections. Next
time you go into a big building parking garage look around.
Those concrete poles, the concrete ceiling the concrete walls
and foundation structure all steel reinforced and computer designed...all
huge. Think of the size and weight that the building puts on the
supports, now think about earthquakes, tornado's and such. The extra
level of strength built in is unbelievable. Concrete is gaged by the ability
of its structural strength, a simple core sample would reveal any weakness.
Proof # 2 - Laws of physics
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that the force exerted by an
unshaped charge is inversely proportional to the SQUARE of the distance,
and therefore it is simply impossible for a fertilizer bomb outside the
building to have severed three or four columns. That's why there must have
been another three or four bombs, presumably strapped to the support columns
in the basement. Nothing else could have severed the rebar and pulverized
the concrete, which is what brought the building down.
An interesting parallel with the JFK story : in both cases the
government/media cover story requires the public to ignore their fundamental
understanding of physics : 1963 we were asked to believe if a man
is shot in the back of the head, his head moves backwards and the public
bought it.
For a serious study check General
Partin report.
There were bombs inside the building ( Conclusion #2 )
"A classified report prepared by two independent Pentagon experts has concluded
that the destruction of the federal building in Oklahoma City last April
was caused by five separate bombs. The two experts reached the same conclusion
for the same technical reasons." - The quote is from an article in the
3-20-1996 Strategic Investment Newsletter. At the time, William Colby,
former CIA Director, was an editor for the publication. Colby died 4-27-1996
in a canoe accident.
An expert on munitions came out after the bombing. His analysis of the
damage indicated the same results as this. Additionally, he did a drawing
showing WHERE each was placed. He said the entire building didn't come
down because of a bad connection, and 2 of the bombs didn't detonate. Those
were the ones the "bomb squad" that many of us saw arrive on CNN removed.
There were exercises conducted the week BEFORE the bombing of
a terrorist attack almost exactly the same as the Murrah Building Bombing.
AND it is fairly common knowledge in OK City that the Feds did not come
in to their offices that day.
One other question, the person who called 911 or who called the bomb
squad was a specialist in bomb detonations, and defusing of this particular
type and was only a block away.
Coincidence? No more likely than getting 5 in a row straight royal flushes
in Vegas.
Pretending there were no bombs inside
the crater
the FBI claimed the crater – which is an important piece of evidence, especially
in determining how big a bomb was used – was 32 feet wide in diameter
The reality is it was between 16 and 18 feet in diameter. We've proved
that and clearly show that in our report. When they had this FEMA-sponsored
group of American Society of Civil Engineers come in and do their report,
they wouldn't let them get any closer than 200 feet. And they fed them
information, including the 32-foot crater. They said then it was 28 to
32 feet. They fed them the information to produce this report. They didn't
let them come on and do a hands-on inspection."
censoring that the structural supports show signs of shaped charges (a
directional charge)
- Why was the Kansas Pizza delivery man's testimony - as to the radical
description variation of the man in the Kansas motel room, who the Government
identified as McVeigh - totally discarded by during the trial?
- How many people actually believe that McVeigh parked his car in downtown
Oklahoma City, removed the license plate and attached a note on the window
stating essentially that, "he would be back in a few days to pick it up;
and to please don't disturb it"
- How was the FBI clever enough to back trace that rental truck axle to
McVeigh in a matter of hours?
- Did the rental truck agency clerk in Kansas immediately recognize that
McVeigh (renting under an assumed name), was the actual person who rented
the truck when questioned by the FBI.?
- Can you believe that McVeigh had all of his Anti Government literature
on the front seat of his car in plain view when he was stopped by the local
Oklahoma Police?
- Why was the license plate supposedly removed from the vehicle?
- Why was McVeigh trying to get caught?
- Did McVeigh really ask his council when first meeting them in jail about
whether or not the room was wired, and when told that it wasn't, said:
"I Did It"
- Why was the fundamental right, to express himself, denied to McVeigh
ever since?
So who placed the bombs inside ? ( Conclusion #3 )
The most convincing evidence is the length to which the government has
gone to cover-up the fact there were multiple bombs in the building. What
do they gain by covering up that ?
Also revealing : presenting McVeigh as guilty; attempting
to lay a false trail to a foreign party. For the people that started suspecting
: creating John Does, as if the cover-up was about who helped McVeigh.
The new justice and the Oklahoma City Bombing - May 2001
Time to set the pieces of the puzzle together
Mass Media implants in the minds of people that McVeigh confessed. The
main messenger used is McVeigh's former defense lawyer, Stephen Jones.The
fact is that there aren't any video tapes of McVeigh confessing.
All serious studies available prove that McVeigh could not have done it.
They were all ignored in the process.
The Department of Justice informs that the FBI accidentally withheld thousands
of documents from McVeigh's defense team - one week before McVeigh's execution.
McVeigh's execution is delayed one month, but the Department of Justice
immediately states that "now there will be no more delays".
Three days later - May 15 -, the Department of Justice announces
that FBI field offices were told in December that some Oklahoma City bombing
records could be discarded, but those instructions were retracted a
month later after archivists discovered that some offices had failed
to turn over all their evidence to lawyers for Timothy McVeigh. A few hours
later it announces that some of the missing documents may have been shredded.
June 4, the Justice Department
- argued that McVeigh could not prove that newly discovered FBI documents
turned over to his attorneys last month showed "actual innocence," as required
under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.
- said McVeigh's legal team had identified only nine new documents
"totaling little more than 20 pages that he claims would have helped
the defense." From a total of 4400 pages they had been looking at for the
past ten days.
The missing piece - WHY ? ( Conclusion #4 )
The image of the puzzle clearly shows the redefintion of justice the other
way round (anti-justice). It shows the precedents set by the most important
FBI case in the US history :
the concept of justice has been rewritten. From now on it's no more "innocent
until proven guilty" - it's "guilty until proven innocent". The coin with
O.J.Simpson on the other side - innocent no matter what the evidence -
is completed.
the process of trying to prove innocent has been rewritten. From now on
it's perfectly normal, especially in processes involving the death penalty
for the FBI : to destroy files, and not turn over evidence to the defense
for the accused : to expect to be denied the right of expression and to
get defense lawyers in charge of destroying any hopes he would have to
"prove innocent"
The missing piece is : why was #3 leaked now, leading to the subsequent
pieces, which merely state again #1 and #2 in bold.
The answer is the same as for the question why
was this photo staged . To bring the message of terror to everyone.
Also to the ones that lost long ago the capacity of posing questions.
June 4, 2001
The message of the antichrist and the "last words" of Timothy McVeigh
McVeigh ALWAYS believed in God, as he was able to state in the few sentences
available in the media, ever since he was arrested,
in
an interview with TIME magazine (including audio).
One day before being murdered, McVeigh was being portrayed as an agnostic,
by the Buffalo News - the newspaper in charge of propagating the "interviews"
with McVeigh. Of course McVeigh couldn't speak the final words. The usage
of "handwritten" letters was pushed to the utter limits : a note was made
public pretending that his final words were "I'm the captain of my soul
...". With this the antichrist is telling people : "We are the captains
of your souls". One thing was not denied to McVeigh : the last sacrament, which includes
confession and an absolution of sins, by a catholic priest. The reason
was that it gave the opportunity to propagate again the message that McVeigh
confessed. The agents used were again the defense lawyers. Here also, cynism
was pushed to the utter limits. Asked by media if McVeigh confessed to
the priest, attorney Robert Nigh answered : "I think it speaks for itself".
June 11, 2001